Where
Have We Come From?
History of the species is written on the genes of its each individual. Genome is a
palimpsest. Eons scribble on it – in a simple language comprising
four alphabets and twenty odd, three-lettered words – as the organism evolves
over geological ages.
Life
originated on earth nearly three thousand five hundred million years ago.
Humans have been around for about 0.4 million years. Thus, a major portion of
the book of our genome was written when we were not humans; if the book had one
page for each million years, human story would occupy less than half a page in the
three thousand five-hundred-page book.
Modern
humans originated in Africa. Story of our African parentage is indelibly etched
in each cell of our body, numbering trillions. These etchings tell us a
singularly fascinating tale of our ancestors as they travelled out of Africa
and established home in the wider world. They were then, hunter-gatherers. Civilisations
were born many millennia later. Movement of people across the continents
continued. There was mixture of genes between the old inhabitants of the land
and the new arrivals. A new race, a new culture arose from this union and
became native to the land.
Till
recently, knowledge about how the people in our world came to be what they are
today, was available only through history, archaeology, linguistics and
genetics. These sciences provided only a narrow peep into our deep past. In the
last decade a new branch of genetics, Ancient DNA studies, revolutionised our
knowhow of human prehistory.
I
read two wonderful books on this subject, this year. David Reich’s Who We
Are and How We Came Here, and Tony Joseph’s Early Indians.
I
want to talk about Tony Joseph’s book today.
Early
Indians: The Story of Our Ancestors and Where We Came From
Tony
Joseph
History is an
important refuge of a rabble-rousing politician. World is seeing a tilt towards
extreme right today. Leaders outdo themselves as they invent increasingly rabid
versions of chest-thumping, exclusivist nationalism. History has thus found new
fans. But what these people profess is not history. It’s a farrago of myths and folklores. It is
pedalled as history in an attempt to give this mish-mash a patina of
respectability. Its assertions are not arrived at by the painstaking study of
ruins, fossils, rocks and artifacts in the jungles of Africa or in the mounds
of Mohenjo-Daro or Babylon, but manufactured in the minds of fanatics.
Ancient DNA
research has revealed many surprising facts about movement of people across
continents in the very deep past. David Reich has been in the forefront of this
global research. His book, Who We Are and How We Came Here,
published in 2018, is a tour de force. It details Reich’s decade-long research
in mapping the migration of people in the prehistoric times.
In the book,
Reich discussed the origin of the modern populations of each continent. He
devoted a chapter on India. This erased much ignorance but also incited a
greater thirst. I recently read Early Indians, by Tony Joseph, published
in the same year as Reich’s book. Joseph, a journalist by profession, has
written a magnificent book about the origins of Indians.
Tony Joseph
begins the book with the earliest humans who came to India from Africa, about
sixty thousand years ago. Evidence of these has been found in the hills of
Bhimbetka in Madya Pradesh. He then discusses the Harappan people: Did they
descend purely from the earliest humans in India, i.e., people of Bhimbetka? Or
were Harappans a mixture of west Asians and the early Indians? He talks about
the decline of Harappan civilization and the controversial subject of the
arrival of Yamnaya people – who came to be called Aryans – from the Eurasian Steppes.
This fact is repudiated by the neo-nationalists in India today.
There is much
jingoistic bombast by a faction of Indian politicians these days, about
Harappans being the original inhabitants of India. These xenophobes are loath
to countenance the fact that a group of people, the Aryans, arrived in India
from another land with their language, gods and culture and mingled with
natives so inseparably that each one of us today is the product of this
admixture that occurred many millennia back. According to these demagogues, we
are the original Aryans, ancestors of all other Indo-European races, and
Sanskrit is the mother of all Indo-European languages. It is we who spread this
culture across the world. The extant knowledge about ancient Indians, gleaned
from geology, palaeontology, archaeology, philology – study of ancient
languages, anthropology, and reinforced by the findings of Ancient DNA studies,
proves the claims of these politicians, a laughable rant. I do not know why
these ignorant leaders start with Harappans. Why not claim that modern Humans
did not originate in Africa, but in India? And then spread to all other
continents from here.
But facts,
supported by evidence speak a different language.
i)
People from every part of India today, are a mix of the
Earliest Indians (venturing out-of-Africa 60-70,000 years back), Iranian
agriculturists (from Zagros mountains in Eastern Iran) and Yamnaya pastoralists
(from Eurasian steppes, the so-called Aryans)
ii)
Aryans came from north and had first contact with the
people of North India. These were Harappans. North Indians have greater share
of Aryan genes compared with the people of South India.
iii)
Sanskrit is derived from a proto Indo-European language
– root of other Indo-European languages like English, French, German, Spanish,
etc., – the language of the Yamnaya people. Languages derived from Sanskrit are
spoken in the Northern regions of India.
Arrival of Aryans may have pushed Harappan people to southern India. Dravidian
languages spoken in South India, are similar to Proto-Elamite which was spoken
in the Zagros mountain region of Iran about 6000-7000 years ago, around the
time that Harappan civilisation too thrived. Harappans share genetic similarity
with these people.
iv)
70-90 percent of mitochondrial DNA of Indians
(mitochondrial DNA is inherited only from the maternal lineage) belongs to
Earliest Indians while only 10-40 percent of Y chromosome (Y chromosome is
inherited only from fathers) in Indians, traces its lineage from the Earliest
Indians (Occupying armies comprise largely males, who often take local women as
partners).
v)
People of higher castes and speakers of Sanskrit family
of languages – spoken largely in Northern India – have higher genetic heritage
from Aryans.
vi)
Onge people of the Little Andaman, the southernmost
island in the Andaman Archipelago, with a population of only 112 today, have
the genome that is closest to the Earliest Indians, having no traces of the
Iranian or Aryan inheritance. (Should they then be the strongest contenders for
the most authentic Indian?)
Joseph cites
evidence from various fields of historical studies. He explains each in a clear
and simple prose. Near the end, he devotes a section to the origin of
caste-system in Indian society.
This is a
remarkable book. It presents technical knowledge with stunning clarity. It
reads like a well-narrated tale, which it is; the story of who we Indians are
and how we came to this great subcontinent. No Indian can afford to remain
ignorant of this story.
Comments
Post a Comment